Ramaphosa is a monster that Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma created

By Izazi Team

One of the contributors to our website warned the ANC Branches before the Nasrec Conference that Cyril Ramaphosa is not the real member of the ANC, and so are his followers. He said if the NDZ slate won the elections for the presidency of the country and the CR17 decided to leave after that; the ANC should let them go in peace than keep this cancer for the sake of unity that is fake...

Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma and Cyril Ramaphosa being sworn in

This because the faction is obviously not working for the interest of saving or uniting the organisation but to destroy it completely so that their real party; the Democratic Alliance can be able to take over the country via a coalition in 2024, at the earliest. That’s the CIA’s secret plan about CR 17; our analyst said.

That’s why after the ANC controversial Conference; the new National Executive Committee decided to disband the Free State and North-West PECs at the behest of devious court decisions, which culminated in the NEC’s decision to recall former President Jacob Zuma. This move proved beyond reasonable doubt that this ‘unity’ rhetoric preached by both sides before the Conference was nothing else but a false call on the CR17 slate.

They knew very well Zuma’s recall as President had a potential to spark the formation of a new political party, but thanks to Zuma and Radical Economic Transformation activists’ loyalty to the ANC, unlike COPE members in 2008 who were disloyal; they didn’t leave the organisation.

These are the consequences of a serious mistake the NDZ leadership made by allowing that botched up National Conference in Nasrec to go ahead, even after we had warned the delegates through our blogs before Nasrec that Ramaphosa is not going to win that election, and the only way that could happen would be through the rigging of the election.

So we expected Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma to take a lead, stand up and challenge the outcome of the Nasrec Conference or demand a recount, if not another election to sort out the question of the Judicial interference and bogus delegates that were there on CR17 slate.

Former President Jacob Zuma had hinted on this during his opening speech at the Conference; asking why those who continued to take the organisation to the courts were not expelled from the organisation, since a resolution to do so had been adopted by a previous conference. He questioned why this foreign culture was still prevalent in the organisation when there was a proviso in the ANC constitution to expel such elements.

Instead, after the short caucus that allegedly took place in Nasrec following the controversial KZN judicial decision to block PEC delegates from voting; the Top Six outcome came out strangely even, begging this question: was this 3 apiece Top 6 a product of some caucus deal struck behind the delegates and the Branches or a true reflection of the elective vote? We don’t think the latter was the case.

This is where we believe Dr Dlamini-Zuma should have taken the lead by thinking out of the box, as an RET leader on whose shoulders lay the emancipation of Black people from economic bondage, for her to show respect for the mandate of the Branches by saying no, no one has a right to hold any caucus about the Judicial interference, let the Branches use the ANC resolutions and guidelines to deal with those responsible for using Courts to tamper with ANC processes. This decision was not a prerogative for any individual, not even the delegates had a right to hold any caucus without consulting with the structures of the organisation.  So this means the conference ended long before it even started.

The conference should have been called off so that the organisation goes back to the drawing board about the Judicial ambush that the enemy had sprung out of nowhere. No impromptu caucus should have taken such crucial decision to go ahead with a botched up Conference after all the shenanigans that had unfolded regarding the Pietermaritzburg Court overreach that came out of nowhere as soon as the Conference hijackers realised the scales were tipped against them. No ANC delegate had a right to take improvised decisions without the mandate of the ANC Branches.

But even so, Izazi Team would later on discover that the narrative that the Top 6 came out even in Nasrec was inaccurate, misleading and false; since it later transpired that Jessie Duarte and David Mabuza were never loyal members on the RET slate. 

Online publication Africanews-24/7.co.za showed images of Ramaphosa celebrating his victory in Nasrec minutes before the vote counting was finished. Something that implied that something quite sinister happened big time at Nasrec, the consequences of which are three years of Ramaphosa’s well documented damage to the ANC as an organisation and its government, a concerted campaign that still prevails to this day to render the party without a single Municipality next year, not to mention its inevitable extinction by 2022 under his leadership.

On top of this; Senzo Mchunu came out scathing about the outcome of that conference over current SG Ace Magashule’s victory over him, even threatening to demand a recount of the votes. There were also allegations that Dr Dlamini-Zuma, upon hearing about Mchunu’s grievances, retorted by threatening to demand a recount on a Ramaphosa vote too. So what does this mean? A deal maybe?

If this is the case, Ramaphosa is not a product of a fair election in Nasrec, but a product of some sinister compromise, which is now blamed on delegates that allegedly took bribes. But on second scrutiny this narrative seems baseless and misleading. If certain Branch delegates really sold out in Nasrec, who can explain why the majority of them adopted Dlamini-Zuma’s RET manifesto and policies for economic radical change, only for the same delegates to elect Ramaphosa who would not implement them? This is a contradiction.

Today we know that it is Ramaphosa's agents that are sabotaging Eskom. Lo mfo uthakatha emini

Izazi Team will state it clear that buying a Conference is nearly an impossible task because delegates vote alone in their cubicles and no cameras are allowed in there that can prove that you betrayed your Branch mandate.

We have reports that former President Thabo Mbeki’s faction tried to bribe delegates in 2007 towards an ANC Polokwane Conference and failed to win elections. Vote buying agents were spotted in KZN throwing R20 000s around trying to bribe delegates, something that didn’t work hence Mbeki ended up on the losing side in Polokwane.

It was reported that R100 000 000 million went missing from IDC in forms of loans to Sam Shilowa’s wife Wendy Luhabe in 2008, who  was a director of Women's Private Equity Fund, shorty after the Polokwane ANC Conference and prior to the formation of COPE the same year. We believe it is the same money laundering scheme, routinely acquired through BEE deals, that was used unsuccessfully so to buy votes in Polokwane. Because even if a delegate can take that money and promise you a vote as a corrupt leader, there is no way you can ascertain that the delegate betrayed his mandate for you because there are no cameras to record the voting process in the voting station.

If buying votes was working, the National Party, so well resourced before the first democratic elections would have done the same thing by buying votes to legitimise the apartheid oppression by buying a democratic election. They had all the money in the world to buy votes back then. So this narrative that votes in Nasrec were bought, in our view is misleading.

What we believe happened in Nasrec is Thapelo Leponesa’s version of events (here is the footage) towards Nasrec, that there were bogus delegates that were trafficked into the Conference whose membership and Branch affiliation was fraudulent, which explains the R1 Billion that reflected on Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s leaked bank statements on CR17 funding campaigns money trail.  

Leponesa’s version corresponds with Izazi’s Teams research dating back to 2010, when we discovered that IFP leaders in KZN started establishing bogus  ANC Branches round about this time, obviously for the sake of assisting Ramaphosa to clinch Deputy Presidency position in Mangaung two years later, Branches that stayed dormant and won no local elections for the ANC between 2011 and 2016, in preparation for the Nasrec takeover.

To this day; Ramaphosa is working very closely with the IFP, going as far as appointing Mkhuleko Hlengwa to a strategic position as SCOPA Chair. For the first time in the history of the ANC, the IFP voted with the ANC in Gauteng to take over the Metro form the DA and rewarded an IFP member with an MEC position! This, in our view, is a return of favour by Ramaphosa to the IFP for assisting him with bogus delegates for a Nasrec takeover. Read more about these shadow Branches formed by the IFP in the Bhambatha region since 2010 here; the same Branches who would assist in adding numbers to Ramaphosa's delegates in Nasrec seven years later in Nasrec.

To some curious cats like us, it still doesn’t make perfect sense that that Nasrec election outcome produced what is still sold as an even Top 6 to the gullible, although; as we have explained before, everyone knows today that Jessie Duarte and David Mabuza were never on RET slate. It was for the first time in the history of the ANC National Conferences, for the ‘President' not to take a full slate into the Top 6 Executive with him.

Which brings to curiosity the caucus that allegedly sat between the Pietermaritzburg High Court judgement and the Conference. Is there a mysterious deal we know nothing about that was struck during this caucus to continue with a botched up Conference before the elective processes took place? If there was, then Zuma became a victim and a sacrificial lamb of that deal. He is the only one today facing a prison sentence over manufactured charges of corruption that have been dragging on and off, getting reinvented over and over again for more than 20 years now.

Indeed, to an average mind this might look like a fair outcome, especially for the sake of unity after the conference, but at whose expense? At the expense of the people the ANC represents who can’t get land today because Ramaphosa is blocking Land Expropriation. That deal, if it exists; has also proven to be as hypocritical and misleading as all these radio and TV commentators who were selling a non-existent Ramaphoria before the Conference. Today there is evidence everywhere (see footage) that there was no close contention between Dlamini-Zuma and Ramaphosa towards the National Conference. Mkhweban’e leaked bank statements about CR17 donor funding show exactly how this false narrative was bought and sold by the apartheid media.

Believe it or not: Ramaphosa says he wants to tie to a tree white racists who did this to his ancestors so that they may not leave the country. Here

Indeed, everyone wanted to see a united ANC after the conference, but not at the expense of sacrificing disenfranchised people’s rights to  land ownership and economic freedom. If a deal really happened to produce that bizarre outcome that went strangely unchallenged by Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma; the unity excuse remains a gigantic fraud of a century in the history of the ANC as we all know today the consequences of this move are helping the apartheid spies inside the ANC and their opposition counterparts hell-bent on destroying Black people to gain ground on their mission to achieve a Coalition Government come 2024.

Dr Dlamini-Zuma is fully aware that the Nasrec election was rigged, no questions about it. Now the question is; with all the evidence that has surfaced lately, including the CR17 bank statements leaks, Ronald Lamola recordings, and Thapelo Leponesa’s evidence and many other people willing to testify on her behalf, why is she not challenging the outcome of the Nasrec election or call a Special Conference of the ANC Branches? Today she is armed with all the ammunition she needs to challenge that diabolical outcome and succeed.

A Special Conference has powers even to replace the sitting NEC itself, all she needs is 50+1 vote of the National Branches and Provinces, something Dlamini-Zuma would hardly campaign for these days given the acrimony that surrounds Ramaphosa’s leadership today regarding his political tomfoolery that has dogged the country and the ANC ever since he stepped into the Union Buildings three years ago.

It is Dlamini-Zuma’s responsibility to clear the air by demanding another elective conference now before Ramaphosa finishes off the ANC. 2022 is 20 years from now if Ramaphosa continues like this using Covid-19 to postpone the NGC, another Conference that has a potential to charge him for his crimes and expel him from the party, which is supposed to sit in July.

The decision of the NGC about Ramaphosa and his leadership would determine whether the ANC manages to get even a single Municipality during local elections next year because people are fed up with empty promises. Otherwise if the current players do not get substituted at the NGC, no one will ever take the ANC seriously in South Africa. Other people are beginning to call the Mass Democratic Movement a new Black National party, thanks to Ramaphosa’s DA-like administration.

Dlamini-Zuma owes all ANC members who supported her before the conference this little favour. People who supported her have had their businesses destroyed by Ramaphosa and his ilk. Like the apartheid government; Ramaphosa also makes sure that they can’t find work anywhere in South Africa while herself; the leader these activists were vouching for sits comfortably in Parliament, earning a decent salary every month as a Minister of Cogta in Ramaphosa’s Cabinet. This is unfair!

RET activists are beginning to feel like Dlamini-Zuma’s presence in Ramaphosa’s Cabinet is unwittingly giving credence to his illegitimate administration and the fraud that happened in Nasrec, wondering how come she is a passenger in a car that was stolen from her for that matter!

The fact that Ramaphosa is going around persecuting RET activists silently, yet he decided to give her a cushy job in his Cabinet after the Nasrec hijack raises lots of questions. This is the same man whose administration made sure that Zuma’s legal fees are terminated by the government, yet the  same administration pays Dlamini-Zuma more than R80 000 per month as a Minister!

Working side by side with her in this diabolical administration; Ramaphosa has already cut half the face of the ANC off in a period of about three years in office, and God forbid what is in store for the ANC in the next two years if the NGC does not sit  in July and fire him.

Dlamini-Zuma has all the evidence she need today to challenge the Nasrec outcome successfully. Many delegates are willing to testify on her behalf. Even if Ramaphosa left the ANC today to form a new political party, everyone knows he will leave empty handed because he has done enough damage to his political profile by destroying the ANC and its government to attract even a silliest of a small-minded goat to his new political party. Who in his right mind would follow the face of Load-shedding, Covid-19 and job retrenchments?

To anyone who claims splitting Top 6 halfway was a cushion to safeguard the ANC from splitting after the conference, we want to put it on record that there is no record of the ANC in its history, both in exile and inside the country, where the organisation ever struck deals with the apartheid spies in its ranks for the sake of unity or whatever. You do not demand a political position in the ANC by blackmailing the movement. The consequences of striking deals with traitors are atrocious. Like the CIA, they don’t keep their end of the bargain.

That’s why after the Conference the CR17 slate showed its true colours by relieving Zuma of his presidential duties, as a warning to everyone that they were never for unity of the ANC after the Conference from the beginning but for the complete split of the organisation to reduce its numbers, CIA cloak and dagger style.

Even though talks of forming a new pro-Zuma political party made the rounds after Zuma’s recall, something BLF tried to take advantage of to swell its ranks; RET ANC Loyal Members stood steadfast on Social media platforms and said no, no one else should leave the ANC but the apartheid spies themselves.

ANC Loyal Members worked tirelessly by urging everyone who cared about the ANC never to leave the organisation to die in the hands of the apartheid spies, campaigns that worked wonders against Ramaphosa’s tireless efforts to destroy the ANC pre-2019 national elections . For this reason; to this day many ANC Loyal Members are still being persecuted by Cyril Ramaphosa and his rented thugs he pays with R350 Social Relief grants, for demanding the implementation of the Nasrec ANC resolutions.

During ANC Loyal Members campaigns, the message was very clear: Don’t allow the Mass Democratic Movement to be buried by worthless loafers who never struggled for our freedom, after surviving for 107 years!

The ANC went on to win 2019 elections under these very difficult circumstances because its Loyal Members wouldn’t allow Ramaphosa to go into the Guinness Book of Records for destroying the century old vanguard movement of the people as every step he was taking towards this direction was exposed and challenged with the same vigour. ANC Loyal Members were already aware that his mission was to score the ANC below 50+1 through incessant and manufactured Eskom Load-sheddings and massive job retrenchments in the SoEs, which still prevail to this day. ‘Load Shedding’ was exposed for what it was; a scam and a code word for ‘Hate that ANC and vote it out come 2019”. ‘Corona virus’ scare tactic today is his code word for survival; to buy time and avoid accountability to the pending NGC.

This means that the CR17 went to the National Conference with two pronged strategies for ANC destruction. If they had lost, they would break away and join Makhosi Khoza’s political organisation to reduce ANC numbers and merge with a mooted DA coalition involving smaller opposition parties to win the national elections in 2019.

When this strategy failed; their next trump card became their own sinister agents in the NEC who mooted the recall of President Zuma before his term of office ended in 2019, a move they thought would provoke ANC Loyal Members to leave the organisation in anger and form a pro-Zuma political party like those  disloyal COPE members did for Mbeki in 2008. This strategy also proved fruitless; thanks to RET activists loyalty to the ANC.

Nicky Oppenhemiers and his Rotchild family’s stumbling block in completely capturing South Africa and breaking Black people’s unity in South Africa is the ANC, the only nationalist movement remaining that still appeals to all people across racial and tribal lines in the country.

Had implications of recalling Zuma achieved yet another ANC split; this would have given the DA and white people an advantage to take over the country in 2019 while the ANC is divided, the same way Paul Mashatile and David Makhura did in 2016 when they handed over Johannesburg and Tshwane Metros on a silver platter to the DA and used the apartheid media to blame their own proverbial scapegoat President Jacob Zuma afterwards.  

The CIA strategy is always simple with their agents in the ANC: “Go there and mess up the organisation, we’ll find scapegoats to blame for your deeds through Stratcom, just to misdirect people’s anger to  innocent people; their own liberators.”

Holding back Land Expropriation without Compensation is tantamount to spitting on the graves of these ANC martyrs for freedom who died fighting for land onwnership

Now this tells you both ways CR17 wanted to see the ANC dead and buried after the National Conference in Nasrec. No wonder all these faces behind these shenanigans happening at government level right now, including the illicit auctioning of SoEs, worker retrenchments, more debt-plunging of the country are carried out by non other than the Oppenheimer’s gangsters called Clever Boys, a project he created back in 1977 through the Urban Foundation, the same year Steve Biko was assassinated.

These are the people who go around calling themselves businessmen, yet all they ever were, are minor shareholders in the White Monopoly Capitalists private sector via their wives and family members as proxies while they remain in government. No company to show that they ever started from scratch like the Guptas, innovative businessmen who turned South Africa into a first, if not a second country after Nigeria in the African continent to manufacture computers.  Yet these are businessmen that they would insult at every turn because they wanted to start a pro-Black economy.

On top of this; all Clever Blacks were missing in action in the trenches, no record of any sacrifices  they made for the liberation struggle. Many of them were in universities being brainwashed while their peers were in the trenches. They are nothing else but ex-Trade Unionist turned BEE shareholders who go around selling their black faces for a living. Like Bantusatn leaders; no single scar to show for political struggle.

This is enough evidence that these people had no intention whatsoever of saving the ANC after Nasrec. ‘Unity’ was simply their electioneering slogan for the National Conference hijacking. All they wanted to achieve was to see the ANC dying a slow painful death after that for many reasons that those who read our website and media analysis know very well.

As we usually preach to the Nation of Christ: “When the devil says no, he means yes. When the devil says unity, he means factionalism.” Picture this: How could a true leader of the ANC; as Ramaphosa pretends to be, describe an incident where ANC members hurt and wounded each other as a ‘Festival of Chairs?’ This is how he described what transpired at the Eastern Cape Provincial Conference. Here

This is an incident you would expect a Deputy President of the ANC to describe in more sensitive and responsible manner, as a father would describe an incident where he witnessed his own children fighting each other. No father would describe such an incident as a “Festival of Chairs”! This reckless statement proved beyond reasonable doubt how deep Ramaphosa hates the ANC. But the Eastern Cape PEC would go on to endorse him as their Presidential candidate! If this was muti or tribalism in action, it worked wonders!

Truth is that Ramaphosa hasn’t forgiven former President Nelson Mandela and the ANC for snubbing him for Mbeki in the succession race when the WMC tried to sneak him via back door as heir to Mandela’s Presidency.

Secondly, the research we have made found that most of these people backing him in the ANC right now are former Bantustan leaders’ followers who, when the homeland system disintegrated, found themselves without political  homes, until without finding any alternative; strayed into the ANC, not as a their political choice but because they had nowhere else to go. So every time they find a white skivvy of a Black leader in the ANC who kowtows the same way their Bantustan leaders fawned at white people ; they suddenly identify with him.

We have discovered that others, especially those in the current KZN PEC leadership; are infiltrators from the IFP who took advantage that the ANC relaxed its Intelligence apparatus as soon as the organisation returned from exile and preoccupied itself with governing the country after 1994. You will be surprised how much Ramaphosa is loved and adored by IFP members, even Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi recently  announced that he would not mind working with ‘Ramaphosa’s ANC’, when by the same token  he declined the same olive branch extended to him by Zuma after his inauguration in 2009.
This means the Oppenheimers have planted enough agents over the past 25 years inside the ANC for this purpose and now is the opportune moment to set their plan in motion. Up until now the evil plan has been working wonders. As we have explained before; recalling Zuma was no recipe for unity but a mixture of sour grapes and political vengeance for Mbeki’s early exit in Polokwane. Because these Bantustan followers have tribalistic tendencies, Ramaphosa and his handlers found it easy to manipulate them against a Zulu leader in the Eastern Cape.

The CR17’s serious blunder that exposed their dirty motive behind an excuse of ‘uniting the party’ by recalling Zuma as a ‘sweet revenge’ in disguise for a Mbeki demise in Polokwane was when they tried to reconcile two contrasting scenarios:

First; Mbeki overplayed his political persecution of Zuma towards Polokwane, as the Leonard McCarthy and Bulelani Ngcuka tapes would testify, a factional behaviour that was bound to sow divisions in the ANC, exactly like Ramaphosa’s actions today to prosecute Zuma, which tells you, as we stated before, that he was parachuted in Nasrec to finish off what Mbeki left hanging in the Oppenheimers’ relentless mission to destroy the ANC.

Even Judge Christopher Nicholson’ alluded to this when he lambasted Mbeki during his scathing judgement for abusing state organs like the NPA to settle party political scores while there is no single evidence connecting Zuma to what is called an ‘Arms deal corruption’.

Available evidence shows that when this arms procurement programme was undertaken, Zuma was a Provincial MEC in KZN, but desperate attempts are being made to connect him with something that took place far away from his vicinity. The masters of this scapegoating game, the Zionist Jews called the Oppenheimers who are behind this ‘Zuma must Fall’ conspiracy call Zuma: “Our own Fall Guy for our protected apartheid spies and culprits.”

What a pity that Dr Nkosazana-Dlamini Zuma, for the second time since she served under Mbeki’s government, finds herself once gain part and parcel of an administration that is trying to destroy her ex-husband for the crimes that several courts judgements have found to be non-existent.